Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero-tillage reduces the cost of maize cultivation by 11.1% through savings on tillage and irrigation.

A claim from Zero Tillage Method of Maize Cultivation in Visakhapatnam District of North Coastal Zone of Andhra Pradesh · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-tillage reduces the cost of maize cultivation by 11.1% through savings on tillage and irrigation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Zero-tillagee1
Outcome
cost of cultivatione2
Direction
reducinge2
Value
11.1%e2
Qualifier
due to savings on tillage and irrigatione2
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Zero-tillage maize recorded a significant yield advantage, with an average increase of 9.4% (6701 kg/ha vs. 6125 kg/ha in conventional tillage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–893
e2

“reducing the cost of cultivation by approximately 11.1% (Rs. 3,500/ha) due to savings on tillage and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1056

Title

Zero Tillage Method of Maize Cultivation in Visakhapatnam District of North Coastal Zone of Andhra Pradesh

P.B. Pradeep Kumar; B. Bhavani; Tejaewara Rao Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17913181

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-457ea2b3bdff06e75111fd0eff930c02dc787335cfc0834b552e2356cb1fed0f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.