Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Charred rice husk gave a pod yield comparable to the other treatments, at 1983 kg ha-1.

A claim from Effect of Charred Rice Husk on Rainfed Groundnut for Water Retention and Nutrient Management (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Charred rice husk gave a pod yield comparable to the other treatments, at 1983 kg ha-1.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat1
Treatment
charred rice huske4
Outcome
pod yielde4
Direction
comparablee4
Value
1983 kg ha-1e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Rainfed Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–48
e4

“The enriched biochar and charred rice husk produced comparable pod yield of 2010 kg ha-1 and 1983 kg ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2586–2705

Title

Effect of Charred Rice Husk on Rainfed Groundnut for Water Retention and Nutrient Management (Arachis hypogaea L.)

P. Balasubramanian; C.R. Chinnamuthu International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.483

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-461b668bae06d9ff55c94b28e2e91d8f2326ab10fd5391b7f0f21d28d43b339e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Oryza sativa · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.