Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flowering on shoots retained on trees confirmed that irrigation withholding was effective for both cultivars.

A claim from IRRIGATION WITHHOLDING EFFECTS ON OLIVE REPRODUCTIVE BUD DEVELOPMENT FOR CONDITIONS WITH INSUFFICIENT WINTER CHILLING · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering on shoots retained on trees confirmed that irrigation withholding was effective for both cultivars.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Treatment
irrigation withholding methode0
Outcome
Flowering on shootse0
Direction
effectivenesse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“OLIVE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39
e0

“Flowering on shoots maintained on the trees confirmed the effectiveness of the irrigation withholding method for both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1697

Title

IRRIGATION WITHHOLDING EFFECTS ON OLIVE REPRODUCTIVE BUD DEVELOPMENT FOR CONDITIONS WITH INSUFFICIENT WINTER CHILLING

F.J. Castillo-Llanque; H.F. Rapoport; H. Baumann Samanez Acta Horticulturae 2014. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2014.1057.12

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-46b64a67f28e5976a9f42f3ad75b503e1d565937554cc5381b3ae42336b4d9d2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

irrigation · phenology · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.