Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage improved soybean yield compared with no-till in two of four environments.

A claim from Density, not tillage, increases soybean protein concentration in some southeastern US environments · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage improved soybean yield compared with no-till in two of four environments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
conventional tillagee4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
improvede4
Comparator
no‐tille4
Setting
two of four environmentse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Management decisions like planting density and tillage could influence soybean seed composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–104
e4

“conventional tillage improved yield when compared with no‐till in two of four environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–849

Title

Density, not tillage, increases soybean protein concentration in some southeastern US environments

Kenedy Etone Epie; Philip J. Bauer; Kenneth C. Stone; et al. Agronomy Journal 2023. doi:10.1002/agj2.21371

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-46bb46842e4e5d8c3436fd4a6233ea322ccedb771591f3532a0e560d1839ec9f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Grain yield was similar under conventional and no-tillage.

    Growth Analysis of Soybean under No‐Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems · 1999 · compared with conventional tillage (CT)

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.