Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High glucosinolate B. napus seed meal did not consistently suppress soil populations of Pythium spp.

A claim from Suppression of Specific Apple Root Pathogens by Brassica napus Seed Meal Amendment Regardless of Glucosinolate Content · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High glucosinolate B. napus seed meal did not consistently suppress soil populations of Pythium spp.

Treatment
High glucosinolate B. napus cv. Dwarf Essex seed meal amendmentse2
Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume2pathogen
Outcome
soil populations of Pythium spp.e2
Direction
did not consistently suppresse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“High glucosinolate B. napus cv. Dwarf Essex seed meal amendments did not consistently suppress soil populations of Pythium spp. or apple root infection by this pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–520

Title

Suppression of Specific Apple Root Pathogens by Brassica napus Seed Meal Amendment Regardless of Glucosinolate Content

Mark Mazzola; David M. Granatstein; Donald C. Elfving; et al. Phytopathology 2001. doi:10.1094/phyto.2001.91.7.673

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-46e1470de8448ffde28f0b9227ccccb6c9cffce1f49a881c8f9bb745a19e837e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Brassica napus · Pythium · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

other · Pythium · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.