Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In the pale green cultivar Half Tall, growth under high light did not change pigmentation or total glucosinolate content relative to moderate light.

A claim from Growth conditions trigger genotype-specific metabolic responses that affect the nutritional quality of kale cultivars · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the pale green cultivar Half Tall, growth under high light did not change pigmentation or total glucosinolate content relative to moderate light.

Material
Half Talle1
Treatment
growth under high light conditionse1
Outcome
pigmentation or total GSL contente1
Direction
did not induce changese1
Comparator
moderate lighte2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–107
e1

“In the pale green Half Tall, growth under high light conditions did not induce changes in either pigmentation or total GSL content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–790
e2

“under moderate light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–400

Title

Growth conditions trigger genotype-specific metabolic responses that affect the nutritional quality of kale cultivars

Hirofumi Ishihara; Sara Alegre; Jesús Pascual; et al. Journal of Experimental Botany 2024. doi:10.1093/jxb/erae169

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-47864fc15da660d09f5d0ff04cb03c93cb39296f9cc2678890eb80bbc20048e5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

light · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 32 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.