Intervention effectmodel-written summary

With residue, no-till reduced grain, stover and total yields in 1992 and 1994.

A claim from Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Corn Production in Quebec · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With residue, no-till reduced grain, stover and total yields in 1992 and 1994.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
grain, stover, and total yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
1992 and 1994e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On + R (grain) plots, grain, stover, and total yields were lower with NT in 1992 and 1994”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1426
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40

Title

Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Corn Production in Quebec

M. S. Burgess; G. R. Mehuys; C. A. Madramootoo Agronomy Journal 1996. doi:10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800050017x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-484b10ef869fe30ade5b360e8d75d50feb917753c1ddcbfcc0e49537d29611f1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 811 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.