Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plant growth was reduced in continuous winter wheat with burning and plowing compared with the no-till treatments with crop rotations.

A claim from Soilborne Pathogens of Cereals in an Irrigated Cropping System: Effects of Tillage, Residue Management, and Crop Rotation · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth was reduced in continuous winter wheat with burning and plowing compared with the no-till treatments with crop rotations.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
continuous winter wheat treatment with burning and plowinge0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
no-till treatments with crop rotationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Take-all disease and inoculum increased from years 1 to 4 in the continuous winter wheat treatment with burning and plowing, reducing plant growth compared to the no-till treatments with crop rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–817

Title

Soilborne Pathogens of Cereals in an Irrigated Cropping System: Effects of Tillage, Residue Management, and Crop Rotation

T. C. Paulitz; K. L. Schroeder; W. F. Schillinger Plant Disease 2009. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-1-0061

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-48b77b9bea05f07990b4a02441ca699e7075d4e1859b5eb51e160b38e5b5030c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fire · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
See all 7 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this claim · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.