Paper · 2009 · Plant Disease

Soilborne Pathogens of Cereals in an Irrigated Cropping System: Effects of Tillage, Residue Management, and Crop Rotation

T. C. Paulitz; K. L. Schroeder; W. F. Schillinger

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
62
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An irrigated cropping systems experiment was conducted for 6 years in east-central Washington State to examine agronomic and economic alternatives to continuous annual winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with burning and plowing, and to determine how root diseases of cereals are influenced by management practices. The continuous winter wheat treatment with burning and plowing was compared with a 3-year no-till rotation of winter wheat-spring barley (Hordeum vulgare)-winter canola (Brassica napus) and three straw management treatments: burning, straw removal, and leaving the straw stubble standing after harvest. Take-all disease and inoculum increased from years 1 to 4 in the continuous winter wheat treatment with burning and plowing, reducing plant growth compared to the no-till treatments with crop rotations. Inoculum of Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 was significantly lower in the tilled treatment compared to the no-till treatments. Inoculum concentration of Fusarium pseudograminearum was higher than that of F. culmorum, and in one of three years, the former was higher in treatments with standing stubble and mechanical straw removal compared to burned treatments. Residue management method had no effect on Rhizoctonia inoculum, but spring barley had more crown roots and tillers and greater height with stubble burning. This 6-year study showed that irrigated winter wheat can be produced in a no-till rotation without major disease losses and demonstrated how cropping practices influence the dynamics of soilborne cereal diseases and inoculum over time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Take-all disease and inoculum increased from years 1 to 4 in continuous winter wheat with burning and plowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
continuous winter wheat treatment with burning and plowinge0
Outcome
Take-all disease and inoculume0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Take-all disease and inoculum increased from years 1 to 4 in the continuous winter wheat treatment with burning and plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth was reduced in continuous winter wheat with burning and plowing compared with the no-till treatments with crop rotations.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
continuous winter wheat treatment with burning and plowinge0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
no-till treatments with crop rotationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Take-all disease and inoculum increased from years 1 to 4 in the continuous winter wheat treatment with burning and plowing, reducing plant growth compared to the no-till treatments with crop rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum of Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 was significantly lower in the tilled treatment than in the no-till treatments.

Treatment
tilled treatmente0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8Rhizoctonia solani AG-8e0pathogen
Outcome
Inoculum of Rhizoctonia solani AG-8e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
no-till treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani AG-8
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculum of Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 was significantly lower in the tilled treatment compared to the no-till treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum concentration of Fusarium pseudograminearum was higher than that of F. culmorum.

Interactor
Fusarium pseudograminearumFusarium pseudograminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
Inoculum concentratione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculum concentration of Fusarium pseudograminearum was higher than that of F. culmorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one of three years, Fusarium pseudograminearum inoculum was higher in treatments with standing stubble and mechanical straw removal than in burned treatments.

Treatment
standing stubble and mechanical straw removale0
Interactor
Fusarium pseudograminearumFusarium pseudograminearume0pathogen
Outcome
Inoculum concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in one of three yearse0
Comparator
burned treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculum concentration of Fusarium pseudograminearum was higher than that of F. culmorum, and in one of three years, the former was higher in treatments with standing stubble and mechanical straw removal compared to burned treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue management method had no effect on Rhizoctonia inoculum.

Treatment
Residue management methode0
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
Rhizoctonia inoculume0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residue management method had no effect on Rhizoctonia inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley had more crown roots and tillers and greater height with stubble burning.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
stubble burninge0
Outcome
crown roots and tillers and greater heighte0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring barley had more crown roots and tillers and greater height with stubble burning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1329 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study showed that irrigated winter wheat can be produced in a no-till rotation without major disease losses.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
no-till rotatione0
Outcome
without major disease lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated winter wheat can be produced in a no-till rotation without major disease losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1450 · show in text ↑

fire · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

fire · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.