Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Oat competition had the most effect on pea yield, at 0.34-7.18% per oat plant per m2.

A claim from The response of four spring‐sown combinable arable crops to weed competition · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat competition had the most effect on pea yield, at 0.34-7.18% per oat plant per m2.

Treatment
competition from cultivated oatse0
Interactor
Avena sativaAvena sativae0weed
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
most effecte4
Value
0.34–7.18%e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · InteractorSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“competition from cultivated oats ( Avena sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–243
e4

“most effect on the peas and beans (0.34–7.18%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–692
e5

“Reductions in crop growth and yield per oat plant m −2 were calculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–402

Title

The response of four spring‐sown combinable arable crops to weed competition

P. J. W. LUTMAN; F. L. DIXON; R. RISIOTT Weed Research 1994. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1994.tb01981.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-491e4d30c1fae2a8f8fda610b5dff18985b78dde08fd8e26340e3ec964d7c3b2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Avena sativa · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

competition · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.