Paper · 2023 · Agriculture and Forestry

PEAS AS A FACTOR INCREASING THE PRODUCTIVITY OF AGROPHYTOCENOSES

Nadiia Hetman

14
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article presents the results of studies of the productivity of annual crops agrophytocenoses with peas depending on the use of different doses of mineral fertilizers and pre-sowing seed treatment with microelements. According to the biological characteristics of growth and development, the cereal components of grass mixtures differ in the duration of the growing season. Thus, the phase of milky ripeness of spring barley occurs 8-10 days earlier than that of spring triticale and 18-20 days earlier than that of oats. It was found that the created two- and three-component agrophytocenoses consisting of spring triticale, peas and white mustard were 19.5-27.6 % higher in green mass yield compared to spring barley in a mixture with peas and white mustard. The yield of dry matter was 8.42-8.93 and 1.132-1.189 t/ha of crude protein, which was 1.6-1.7 times higher than in the agrophytocenosis with spring barley as the dominant crop. The effectiveness of nitrogen fertilizers at a dose of 60 kg/ha of active ingredient, which provide an increase in the height of field pea plants - by 14.7 and 12.1% of fodder oats, compared to the application of 30 kg/ha on the background of phosphorus-potassium fertilizer (P30K30), was established. The treatment of seeds of both components of agrophytocenosis with microelements Zn and Mo, which was carried out before sowing, stimulated the growth processes of crops. Thus, the height of plants in fodder oats increased by 3.4-6.7 cm and in field peas - by 4.9-5.5 cm on the mineral background of nutrition. The positive effect of mineral fertilisers in a dose of N60P30K30 and seed treatment with trace elements Zn and Mo on the yield of nutrients in the agrophytocenosis was proved. A binary mixture of field peas with a seeding rate of 40% of the full seeding rate and fodder oats of 60% provided the highest dry matter yield of 10.3 and 2.24 t/ha of crude protein. It can be argued about the agrobiological feasibility of growing fodder oats and spring triticale with high-protein crops, which provide a conveyor supply of plant raw materials for harvesting various types of feed and the efficiency of using agrometeorological resources during the period of harvest formation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley reached milky ripeness 8-10 days earlier than spring triticale.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
phase of milky ripenesse0
Direction
earliere0
Value
8-10 dayse0
Comparator
spring triticalee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phase of milky ripeness of spring barley occurs 8-10 days earlier than that of spring triticale and 18-20 days earlier than that of oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–524 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley reached milky ripeness 18-20 days earlier than oats.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
phase of milky ripenesse0
Direction
earliere0
Value
18-20 dayse0
Comparator
oatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phase of milky ripeness of spring barley occurs 8-10 days earlier than that of spring triticale and 18-20 days earlier than that of oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures containing spring triticale, peas and white mustard had 19.5-27.6 % higher green mass yield than mixtures dominated by spring barley.

Taxon
spring triticale, peas and white mustardSinapis albaLathyrus oleraceus×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
two- and three-component agrophytocenosese0
Outcome
green mass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.5-27.6 %e0
Comparator
spring barley in a mixture with peas and white mustarde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the created two- and three-component agrophytocenoses consisting of spring triticale, peas and white mustard were 19.5-27.6 % higher in green mass yield compared to spring barley in a mixture with peas and white mustard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–763 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The spring triticale mixtures yielded 8.42-8.93 t/ha dry matter, with yields reported as 1.6-1.7 times higher than spring barley dominated mixtures.

Taxon
spring triticale, peas and white mustardSinapis albaLathyrus oleraceus×Triticosecalee1
Outcome
yield of dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.42-8.93e0
Qualifier
1.6-1.7 timese0
Comparator
spring barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of dry matter was 8.42-8.93 and 1.132-1.189 t/ha of crude protein, which was 1.6-1.7 times higher than in the agrophytocenosis with spring barley as the dominant crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“agrophytocenoses consisting of spring triticale, peas and white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–651 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The spring triticale mixtures yielded 1.132-1.189 t/ha crude protein, with yields reported as 1.6-1.7 times higher than spring barley dominated mixtures.

Taxon
spring triticale, peas and white mustardSinapis albaLathyrus oleraceus×Triticosecalee1
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.132-1.189 t/hae0
Qualifier
1.6-1.7 timese0
Comparator
spring barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of dry matter was 8.42-8.93 and 1.132-1.189 t/ha of crude protein, which was 1.6-1.7 times higher than in the agrophytocenosis with spring barley as the dominant crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“agrophytocenoses consisting of spring triticale, peas and white mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 60 kg/ha increased field pea height by 14.7% compared with 30 kg/ha on P30K30 background.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizers at a dose of 60 kg/ha of active ingrediente0
Outcome
height of field pea plantse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.7e0
Qualifier
background of phosphorus-potassium fertilizer (P30K30)e0
Comparator
application of 30 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The effectiveness of nitrogen fertilizers at a dose of 60 kg/ha of active ingredient, which provide an increase in the height of field pea plants - by 14.7 and 12.1% of fodder oats, compared to the application of 30 kg/ha on the background of phosphorus-potassium fertilizer (P30K30), was established.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 60 kg/ha increased fodder oat height by 12.1% compared with 30 kg/ha on P30K30 background.

Taxon
fodder oatse0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizers at a dose of 60 kg/ha of active ingrediente0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12.1%e0
Qualifier
background of phosphorus-potassium fertilizer (P30K30)e0
Comparator
application of 30 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“The effectiveness of nitrogen fertilizers at a dose of 60 kg/ha of active ingredient, which provide an increase in the height of field pea plants - by 14.7 and 12.1% of fodder oats, compared to the application of 30 kg/ha on the background of phosphorus-potassium fertilizer (P30K30), was established.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing Zn and Mo seed treatment increased fodder oat height by 3.4-6.7 cm on a mineral nutrition background.

Taxon
fodder oatse0
Treatment
treatment of seeds of both components of agrophytocenosis with microelements Zn and Moe0
Outcome
height of plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.4-6.7 cme0
Qualifier
on the mineral background of nutritione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of seeds of both components of agrophytocenosis with microelements Zn and Mo, which was carried out before sowing, stimulated the growth processes of crops. Thus, the height of plants in fodder oats increased by 3.4-6.7 cm and in field peas - by 4.9-5.5 cm on the mineral background of nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing Zn and Mo seed treatment increased field pea height by 4.9-5.5 cm on a mineral nutrition background.

Taxon
field pease0
Treatment
treatment of seeds of both components of agrophytocenosis with microelements Zn and Moe0
Outcome
height of plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.9-5.5 cme0
Qualifier
on the mineral background of nutritione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of seeds of both components of agrophytocenosis with microelements Zn and Mo, which was carried out before sowing, stimulated the growth processes of crops. Thus, the height of plants in fodder oats increased by 3.4-6.7 cm and in field peas - by 4.9-5.5 cm on the mineral background of nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60P30K30 fertilizer and Zn and Mo seed treatment positively affected nutrient yield in the crop mixture.

Taxon
fodder oatse2
Treatment
mineral fertilisers in a dose of N60P30K30 and seed treatment with trace elements Zn and Moe0
Interactor
field pease2other
Outcome
yield of nutrientse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The positive effect of mineral fertilisers in a dose of N60P30K30 and seed treatment with trace elements Zn and Mo on the yield of nutrients in the agrophytocenosis was proved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1731 · show in text ↑
e1

“both components of agrophytocenosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1305 · show in text ↑
e2

“height of plants in fodder oats increased by 3.4-6.7 cm and in field peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A binary mixture with field peas at 40% and fodder oats at 60% of full seeding rate gave the highest dry matter yield of 10.3 t/ha.

Taxon
field pease0
Treatment
binary mixture of field peas with a seeding rate of 40% of the full seeding rate and fodder oats of 60%e0
Interactor
fodder oatse0other
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A binary mixture of field peas with a seeding rate of 40% of the full seeding rate and fodder oats of 60% provided the highest dry matter yield of 10.3 and 2.24 t/ha of crude protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The binary field pea and fodder oat mixture yielded 2.24 t/ha crude protein.

Taxon
field pease0
Treatment
binary mixture of field peas with a seeding rate of 40% of the full seeding rate and fodder oats of 60%e0
Interactor
fodder oatse0other
Outcome
crude proteine0
Value
2.24 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A binary mixture of field peas with a seeding rate of 40% of the full seeding rate and fodder oats of 60% provided the highest dry matter yield of 10.3 and 2.24 t/ha of crude protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1915 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growing fodder oats with high-protein crops is agrobiologically feasible for sequential feed supply and efficient agrometeorological resource use.

Taxon
fodder oatse0
Interactor
high-protein cropse0other
Outcome
agrobiological feasibility of growing fodder oatse0
Qualifier
conveyor supply of plant raw materials for harvesting various types of feed and the efficiency of using agrometeorological resources during the period of harvest formatione0

Verbatim

e0

“It can be argued about the agrobiological feasibility of growing fodder oats and spring triticale with high-protein crops, which provide a conveyor supply of plant raw materials for harvesting various types of feed and the efficiency of using agrometeorological resources during the period of harvest formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2227 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growing spring triticale with high-protein crops is agrobiologically feasible for sequential feed supply and efficient agrometeorological resource use.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Interactor
high-protein cropse0other
Outcome
agrobiological feasibilitye0
Qualifier
conveyor supply of plant raw materials for harvesting various types of feed and the efficiency of using agrometeorological resources during the period of harvest formatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be argued about the agrobiological feasibility of growing fodder oats and spring triticale with high-protein crops, which provide a conveyor supply of plant raw materials for harvesting various types of feed and the efficiency of using agrometeorological resources during the period of harvest formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2227 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Avena sativa · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Avena sativa · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

molybdenum atom · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

54 papers: 44 positive, 10 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.