Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Coating with P. libanensis plus multiple R. irregularis isolates increased cowpea shoot dry weight by 76% against uninoculated controls.

A claim from Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low‐input agricultural system · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating with P. libanensis plus multiple R. irregularis isolates increased cowpea shoot dry weight by 76% against uninoculated controls.

Treatment
Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR)e0
Interactor
P. libanensisPseudomonas libanensise0symbiont
Second interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
76%e0
Comparator
non-inoculated control plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · Second interactorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR) resulted in significant increases in shoot dry weight (76%), and in the number of pods and seeds per plant (52% and 56%, respectively) and grain yield (56%), when compared with non-inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1058
t0

“cowpea productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62

Title

Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low‐input agricultural system

Inês Rocha; Pablo Souza‐Alonso; Graça Pereira; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2019. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10117

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-49393fbcfe4eab69b9c70dde26815d8906a07c35451a48f84c1d238dce2265ea · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.