Pseudomonas libanensis 13 claims

species · family Pseudomonadaceae · bacterium · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

3 spellings

13 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas libanensis 5 OK 7A showed the best phytohormone production.

Taxon: Miscanthus giganteusMiscanthus ×giganteust0
Interactor: Pseudomonas libanensis 5 OK 7APseudomonas libanensise0symbiont
Outcome: phytohormone productione0
Direction: beste0

Verbatim

e0
“Pseudomonas libanensis 5 OK 7A showed the best results in phytohormone production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1207

t0
“Miscanthus giganteus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–77

Title

Plant Growth-Promoting Endophytic Bacteria Isolated from Miscanthus giganteus and Their Antifungal Activity

Petra Lovecká; Gabriela Kroneislová; Zuzana Novotná; et al. Microorganisms 2023. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11112710

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Selected endophytes could solubilize inorganic phosphorus and fix nitrogen.
Observation Selected endophytes produced phytohormones, ACC deaminase, and siderophore.
Observation Pantoea ananat is 50 OL 2 produced siderophores with a zone of at least 5 mm.
Observation Pantoea ananat is 50 OL 2 produced limited phytohormones.
Observation Pantoea ananat is 50 OL 2 was the only isolate with ACC deaminase activity.
Observation That Pseudomonas isolate produced N6-(Δ2-isopentenyl)adenine at 11.7 ng·mL−1.
Observation That Pseudomonas isolate produced indole-3-acetic acid at 12.6 ng·mL−1.
Observation Root endophytes inhibited tested fungal growth by 30 to 60%.
Recommendation The authors suggest endophytic Pseudomonas as crop biofertilizers.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial viability was maintained after storage in alginate beads.

Taxon: Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Interactor: Pseudomonas libanensisPseudomonas libanensist0symbiont
Outcome: bacterial viabilitye0

Verbatim

e0
“After storage, bacterial viability was maintained”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–731

t0
“Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–125

Title

Encapsulation of Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata under drought stress

Pablo Souza-Alonso; Miguel Rocha; Inês Rocha; et al. 3 Biotech 2021. doi:10.1007/s13205-021-02818-4

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Air-dried beads had a higher number of colony-forming units, 2 × 107.
Observation After 10 days without water, cowpea turgidity and relative water content remained above 80%.
Intervention effect Water restriction produced no significant change in leaf and root growth or biomass, including after P. libanensis inoculation.
Intervention effect Inoculation slightly affected stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate and leaf CO2 concentration.
Intervention effect Inoculation slightly affected Fv'/Fm'.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-dried beads had a higher number of colony-forming units, 2 × 107.

Taxon: Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment: air-dried beadse0
Interactor: Pseudomonas libanensisPseudomonas libanensist0symbiont
Outcome: number of colony-forming unitse0
Direction: highere0
Value: 2 × 107e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“air-dried beads displayed a higher number of colony-forming units (2 × 107)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–812

t0
“Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–125

Title

Encapsulation of Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata under drought stress

Pablo Souza-Alonso; Miguel Rocha; Inês Rocha; et al. 3 Biotech 2021. doi:10.1007/s13205-021-02818-4

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Bacterial viability was maintained after storage in alginate beads.
Observation After 10 days without water, cowpea turgidity and relative water content remained above 80%.
Intervention effect Water restriction produced no significant change in leaf and root growth or biomass, including after P. libanensis inoculation.
Intervention effect Inoculation slightly affected stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate and leaf CO2 concentration.
Intervention effect Inoculation slightly affected Fv'/Fm'.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water restriction produced no significant change in leaf and root growth or biomass, including after P. libanensis inoculation.

Taxon: Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment: water restrictione0
Interactor: P. libanensisPseudomonas libanensise0symbiont
Outcome: Leaf and root growth and biomasse0
Direction: did not evidence significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Leaf and root growth and biomass did not evidence significant changes after water restriction even after P. libanensis inoculation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1276

t0
“Vigna unguiculata under drought stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–146

Title

Encapsulation of Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata under drought stress

Pablo Souza-Alonso; Miguel Rocha; Inês Rocha; et al. 3 Biotech 2021. doi:10.1007/s13205-021-02818-4

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Bacterial viability was maintained after storage in alginate beads.
Intervention effect Air-dried beads had a higher number of colony-forming units, 2 × 107.
Observation After 10 days without water, cowpea turgidity and relative water content remained above 80%.
Intervention effect Inoculation slightly affected stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate and leaf CO2 concentration.
Intervention effect Inoculation slightly affected Fv'/Fm'.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation slightly affected stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate and leaf CO2 concentration.

Taxon: Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment: inoculatione0
Interactor: Pseudomonas libanensisPseudomonas libanensist0symbiont
Outcome: stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, leaf CO2 concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Plant photosynthetic parameters (stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, leaf CO2 concentration, or Fv'/Fm') were slightly affected due to inoculation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1435

t0
“Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–125

Title

Encapsulation of Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata under drought stress

Pablo Souza-Alonso; Miguel Rocha; Inês Rocha; et al. 3 Biotech 2021. doi:10.1007/s13205-021-02818-4

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Bacterial viability was maintained after storage in alginate beads.
Intervention effect Air-dried beads had a higher number of colony-forming units, 2 × 107.
Observation After 10 days without water, cowpea turgidity and relative water content remained above 80%.
Intervention effect Water restriction produced no significant change in leaf and root growth or biomass, including after P. libanensis inoculation.
Intervention effect Inoculation slightly affected Fv'/Fm'.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation slightly affected Fv'/Fm'.

Taxon: Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment: inoculatione0
Interactor: Pseudomonas libanensisPseudomonas libanensist0symbiont
Outcome: Fv'/Fm'e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Plant photosynthetic parameters (stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, leaf CO2 concentration, or Fv'/Fm') were slightly affected due to inoculation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1435

t0
“Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–125

Title

Encapsulation of Pseudomonas libanensis in alginate beads to sustain bacterial viability and inoculation of Vigna unguiculata under drought stress

Pablo Souza-Alonso; Miguel Rocha; Inês Rocha; et al. 3 Biotech 2021. doi:10.1007/s13205-021-02818-4

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Bacterial viability was maintained after storage in alginate beads.
Intervention effect Air-dried beads had a higher number of colony-forming units, 2 × 107.
Observation After 10 days without water, cowpea turgidity and relative water content remained above 80%.
Intervention effect Water restriction produced no significant change in leaf and root growth or biomass, including after P. libanensis inoculation.
Intervention effect Inoculation slightly affected stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate and leaf CO2 concentration.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating with P. libanensis plus multiple R. irregularis isolates increased cowpea shoot dry weight by 76% against uninoculated controls.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment: Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR)e0
Interactor: P. libanensisPseudomonas libanensise0symbiont
Second interactor: R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome: shoot dry weighte0
Direction: increasese0
Value: 76%e0
Comparator: non-inoculated control plantse0

Verbatim

e0
“Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR) resulted in significant increases in shoot dry weight (76%), and in the number of pods and seeds per plant (52% and 56%, respectively) and grain yield (56%), when compared with non-inoculated control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1058

t0
“cowpea productivity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62

Title

Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low‐input agricultural system

Inês Rocha; Pablo Souza‐Alonso; Graça Pereira; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2019. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10117

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea pod number per plant by 52%.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea seed number per plant by 56%.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea grain yield by 56%.
Intervention effect Coating with P. libanensis plus a single R. irregularis isolate did not influence cowpea grain yield.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating raised cowpea grain lipid content by 25% compared with controls.
Observation Soil organic matter was higher under the multiple-isolate cowpea coating.
Observation Soil pH was lower under the multiple-isolate cowpea coating.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea pod number per plant by 52%.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment: Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR)e0
Interactor: P. libanensisPseudomonas libanensise0symbiont
Second interactor: R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome: number of podse0
Direction: increasese0
Value: 52%e0
Comparator: non-inoculated control plantse0

Verbatim

e0
“Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR) resulted in significant increases in shoot dry weight (76%), and in the number of pods and seeds per plant (52% and 56%, respectively) and grain yield (56%), when compared with non-inoculated control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1058

t0
“cowpea productivity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62

Title

Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low‐input agricultural system

Inês Rocha; Pablo Souza‐Alonso; Graça Pereira; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2019. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10117

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Coating with P. libanensis plus multiple R. irregularis isolates increased cowpea shoot dry weight by 76% against uninoculated controls.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea seed number per plant by 56%.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea grain yield by 56%.
Intervention effect Coating with P. libanensis plus a single R. irregularis isolate did not influence cowpea grain yield.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating raised cowpea grain lipid content by 25% compared with controls.
Observation Soil organic matter was higher under the multiple-isolate cowpea coating.
Observation Soil pH was lower under the multiple-isolate cowpea coating.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea seed number per plant by 56%.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment: Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR)e0
Interactor: P. libanensisPseudomonas libanensise0symbiont
Second interactor: R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome: seeds per plante0
Direction: increasese0
Value: 56%e0
Comparator: non-inoculated control plantse0

Verbatim

e0
“Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR) resulted in significant increases in shoot dry weight (76%), and in the number of pods and seeds per plant (52% and 56%, respectively) and grain yield (56%), when compared with non-inoculated control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1058

t0
“cowpea productivity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62

Title

Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low‐input agricultural system

Inês Rocha; Pablo Souza‐Alonso; Graça Pereira; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2019. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10117

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Coating with P. libanensis plus multiple R. irregularis isolates increased cowpea shoot dry weight by 76% against uninoculated controls.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea pod number per plant by 52%.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea grain yield by 56%.
Intervention effect Coating with P. libanensis plus a single R. irregularis isolate did not influence cowpea grain yield.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating raised cowpea grain lipid content by 25% compared with controls.
Observation Soil organic matter was higher under the multiple-isolate cowpea coating.
Observation Soil pH was lower under the multiple-isolate cowpea coating.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea grain yield by 56%.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment: Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR)e0
Interactor: P. libanensisPseudomonas libanensise0symbiont
Second interactor: R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: increasese0
Value: 56%e0
Comparator: non-inoculated control plantse0

Verbatim

e0
“Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR) resulted in significant increases in shoot dry weight (76%), and in the number of pods and seeds per plant (52% and 56%, respectively) and grain yield (56%), when compared with non-inoculated control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1058

t0
“cowpea productivity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62

Title

Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low‐input agricultural system

Inês Rocha; Pablo Souza‐Alonso; Graça Pereira; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2019. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10117

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Coating with P. libanensis plus multiple R. irregularis isolates increased cowpea shoot dry weight by 76% against uninoculated controls.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea pod number per plant by 52%.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating increased cowpea seed number per plant by 56%.
Intervention effect Coating with P. libanensis plus a single R. irregularis isolate did not influence cowpea grain yield.
Intervention effect The multiple-isolate coating raised cowpea grain lipid content by 25% compared with controls.
Observation Soil organic matter was higher under the multiple-isolate cowpea coating.
Observation Soil pH was lower under the multiple-isolate cowpea coating.