Claim · model-written summary
Recovery of N applied at planting was 30 to 55%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- N applied at plantinge1
- Outcome
- recovery of Ne1
- Value
- 30 to 55%e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The recovery of N applied at planting ranged from 30 to 55%, while that of N applied at anthesis ranged from 55 to 80%”
t0“Efficiency of Irrigated Wheat”
Title
S. B. Wuest; K. G. Cassman Agronomy Journal 1992. doi:10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400040028x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Recovery of N applied at anthesis was 55 to 80%.
- Intervention effect The N rate or timing of application did not affect the contribution of soil N to total plant N.
- Association Fertilizer N applied at anthesis had the greatest influence on postanthesis N uptake, 17 to 77 kg N ha −1.
- Observation Without supplemental N at anthesis, postanthesis N uptake provided only 12 to 18% of the total grain N demand.
- Intervention effect Greater preplant N input did not increase postanthesis N uptake.
- Intervention effect Preplant N treatments did not affect extractable and mineralizable soil N at anthesis.
- Intervention effect Late N application is taken up efficiently by plants and does not decrease soil N uptake.
- Recommendation N should be supplied late in the season to achieve acceptable grain protein levels in irrigated bread wheat.