Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CT and SB gave higher maize grain and stover yield.

A claim from Effects of tillage systems on Soil Chemical Properties in Oxic Paleustalf Soil of a Degraded Land · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT and SB gave higher maize grain and stover yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
CT and SBe4
Outcome
grain and stover yielde4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“CT and SB resulted in higher maize grain and stover yield and soil available phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1188

Title

Effects of tillage systems on Soil Chemical Properties in Oxic Paleustalf Soil of a Degraded Land

Matthew O. Adigun; S.K Are; O.T Oladitan; et al. Journal of Experimental Sciences 2013

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-4d403feca445a22cf3f0b70c0c9b1bc030d3451ca74a0602d7fc633adab0d520 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fire · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.