Intervention effectmodel-written summary

R. lauricola caused significantly greater symptoms than water inoculation in swamp bay.

A claim from Response of swamp bay, Persea palustris, and redbay, P. borbonia, to Raffaelea spp. isolated from Xyleborus glabratus · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R. lauricola caused significantly greater symptoms than water inoculation in swamp bay.

Taxon
swamp bayPersea palustrist0
Treatment
R. lauricolae0
Interactor
R. lauricolaHarringtonia lauricolae0pathogen
Outcome
symptomse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
water inoculationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea palustris
Persea palustris · TaxonSteven Joyner · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Harringtonia lauricola
Harringtonia lauricola · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBobyellow · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only R. lauricola caused significantly greater symptoms than water inoculations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–659
t0

“swamp bay, Persea palustris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–39

Title

Response of swamp bay, Persea palustris, and redbay, P. borbonia, to Raffaelea spp. isolated from Xyleborus glabratus

T. J. Dreaden; A. S. Campbell; C. A. Gonzalez‐Benecke; et al. Forest Pathology 2016. doi:10.1111/efp.12288

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-4d4b2282bdc083d9599604cf1688169a055b1ae108bc5e73696c8c4def5922d8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Harringtonia lauricola · disease · Persea palustris (swamp bay)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.