Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All organic amendments produced better cowpea nutrient uptake than chemical fertilizer and control.

A claim from Effects of organic amendments in comparison with chemical fertilizer on cowpea growth · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All organic amendments produced better cowpea nutrient uptake than chemical fertilizer and control.

Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer and controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the organic amendments showed better plant growth and nutrient uptake when compared to chemical fertilizer and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–464
t0

“cowpea growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85

Title

Effects of organic amendments in comparison with chemical fertilizer on cowpea growth

Rabia Badar; Maria Khan; Bisma Batool; et al. International journal of applied research 2015

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-4dc6445f08ccfa9924c66f8a4606b3a3fbca861d6e4c340987ada17a62b30668 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

organic · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.