Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ethephon delayed flower bud development after endodormancy.

A claim from EFFECTS OF FALL APPLICATIONS OF ETHEPHON AND GA3 ON PEACH TREES · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon delayed flower bud development after endodormancy.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
Development of flower budse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Development of flower buds (after endodormancy completion) was significantly delayed by GA 3 and ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–395
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–63

Title

EFFECTS OF FALL APPLICATIONS OF ETHEPHON AND GA3 ON PEACH TREES

D.E. Deyton; D.W. Lockwood; S. Ventataraman HortScience 1992. doi:10.21273/hortsci.27.6.690c

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-4dfd2d4477f2f6644fd969dec85b634cad7f9938fe1efa62df74054ca1dcd8a0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.