Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at critical stages increased wheat grain yield to 48.7 q/ha.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- irrigation applied at critical stages (CRI, LT, LJ, F and M)e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 48.7 q/hae1
- Comparator
- IW/CPE ratio of 0.7e1
- Setting
- Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, Indiae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field experiment on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was carried out during two consecutive rabi seasons 2021-22 and 2022-23 at Crop Research Centre of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India”
e1“the irrigation applied at critical stages (CRI, LT, LJ, F and M) resulted in significantly (P<0.05) tallest plants, more number of physiologically active leaves/plant at 50% flowering stage, days taken to 50% flowering, days taken to maturity, spike length, grains weight/spike, grain yield (48.7 q/ha), protein content (11.1 %) in grains and crop water use (541.9 mm) over IW/CPE ratio of 0.7”
Title
Vivek Pandey; Adesh Singh; Vivek; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102713
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect Irrigation at critical stages gave more tallest plants and more physiologically active leaves per plant than IW/CPE 0.7 in wheat.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at critical stages increased days to 50% flowering and days to maturity in wheat.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at critical stages increased spike length and grains weight per spike in wheat.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at critical stages increased grain protein content to 11.1 % in wheat.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at critical stages increased crop water use to 541.9 mm in wheat.
- Intervention effect Soil pH and electrical conductivity were maximum under IW/CPE 0.7 in the wheat trial.
- Intervention effect Water productivity in wheat was highest at IW/CPE 0.9 ratio, followed by 0.7.
- Intervention effect With N3 the wheat plants were significantly taller and had more days to 50% flowering and to maturity than the other INM modules, except that plant height was on par with N2 and N6.
- Intervention effect Soil pH under N3 did not vary significantly in the wheat trial.
- Intervention effect Under N5 the maximum values were recorded for physiologically active leaves per plant, grains weight per spike and electrical conductivity in wheat.
- Intervention effect Under N5 grain protein content was 11.2% and the maximum among treatments in wheat.
- Intervention effect Physiologically active leaves per plant and grains weight per spike were significantly superior over the control in wheat.
- Intervention effect Grain protein content was superior under N1 and N2 in wheat.
- Intervention effect N6 registered the longest spike and was significantly superior to the control in wheat.
- Intervention effect N6 gave a grain yield of 51.0 q/ha, significantly superior to the control in wheat.
- Intervention effect N6 registered crop water use of 481.0 mm, significantly superior to the control in wheat.
- Intervention effect N6 gave a water productivity of 6.38 kg/ha-mm, significantly superior to the control in wheat.
- Intervention effect N6 out-yielded the control by 23.7 % in wheat.
- Intervention effect N6 out-yielded RDF by 6.3 % in wheat.