Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 60 mm jointing and heading schedule yielded the highest spike numbers (SN) per m2 versus alternative schedules.

A claim from Response of winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency to deficit irrigation in the North China Plain · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 mm jointing and heading schedule yielded the highest spike numbers (SN) per m2 versus alternative schedules.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HSe0
Outcome
spike numbers (SN) per m2e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS) of winter wheat, irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HS provided the highest CDMRG, which resulted to the highest GY and WUE; this result was mainly due to a significant increase of the spike numbers (SN) per m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–821
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24

Title

Response of winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency to deficit irrigation in the North China Plain

Huifang Han; Yujie Ren Zhenxing Yan Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 2018. doi:10.9755/ejfa.2017.v29.i12.1567

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4eaf72dd2fec1ad3827c3a2520014bd8784d03685e9e03ce5dd5c54e69ecd025 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.