Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Single basal nitrogen application had the best yield and profit among the treatments.

A claim from Effects of nitrogen fertilization methods on yield,profit and nitrogen absorption and utilization of spring maize · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single basal nitrogen application had the best yield and profit among the treatments.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
single deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer as basal nitrogen fertilizer single basal applicatione1
Outcome
best yield and profite1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–113
e1

“The treatment of single deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer as basal nitrogen fertilizer single basal application(SBN,N 240 kg/ha,total basal into 15 cm,N 240/1) has the best yield and profit,and the yield is increased by 11.48% and the profit is increased by 2032 Yuan/ha compared with FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–1020

Title

Effects of nitrogen fertilization methods on yield,profit and nitrogen absorption and utilization of spring maize

Bing Ye Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2011

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-4ebff7262a5b3fdd9f9d98f2110d4037083a52a1527e6fa135abd7d3e220d5b0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

2,176 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this claim · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.