Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Common lambsquarters restricted maize root growth more than shoot growth.

A claim from Root Growth of Neighboring Maize and Weeds Studied with Minirhizotrons · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common lambsquarters restricted maize root growth more than shoot growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
common lambsquarterse0t0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0t0weed
Outcome
root growthe0t0
Direction
restrictede0t0
Comparator
shoot growthe0t0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both weed species restricted root growth more than they restricted shoot growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1114
t0

“from 27 to 73% when it was grown with common lambsquarters compared to maize grown alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–917

Title

Root Growth of Neighboring Maize and Weeds Studied with Minirhizotrons

Deborah Britschgi; Peter Stamp; Juan M. Herrera Weed Science 2013. doi:10.1614/ws-d-12-00120.1

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4ef2b4df39c1e6cca1eb0ca6110286bf0c86c66a39e44471a6e66430f7c2b8e0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Chenopodium album · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.