Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Maize malondialdehyde was higher under rapid than slow dehydration.

A claim from Response of Chinese Wampee Axes and Maize Embryos to Dehydration at Different Rates · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize malondialdehyde was higher under rapid than slow dehydration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
embryose0
Treatment
rapid dehydratione0
Outcome
malondialdehyde contentse1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
slow dehydratione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those of maize embryos were higher during rapid dehydration than during slow dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–524
e1

“malondialdehyde contents of wampee axes and maize embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–308

Title

Response of Chinese Wampee Axes and Maize Embryos to Dehydration at Different Rates

Hui Huang; Song‐Quan Song; Xian‐Jin Wu Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00772.x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-4fbac9e77c84a8dace045a63341ddc58001c0accff2183ed29657c322c5e21e8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

96 papers: 8 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

87 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.