Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PRDSDI increased neutral detergent fiber 13.2% at 20-mm in 2017.

A claim from Partial root-zone drying subsurface drip irrigation increased the alfalfa quality yield but decreased the alfalfa quality content · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRDSDI increased neutral detergent fiber 13.2% at 20-mm in 2017.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
PRDSDIe0
Outcome
neutral detergent fibere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.2%e0
Qualifier
20-mme0
Comparator
conventional subsurface drip irrigation (CSDI)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRDSDI significantly increased acid detergent fiber by 13.3% and 12.2% in 2018 with 10-mm and 20-mm irrigation volumes and neutral detergent fiber by 16.2%, 13.2%, and 12.6% in 2017 with 10-mm, 20-mm, and 30-mm irrigation volumes, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–993
e1

“compared with conventional subsurface drip irrigation (CSDI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–372
t0

“the alfalfa quality yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87

Title

Partial root-zone drying subsurface drip irrigation increased the alfalfa quality yield but decreased the alfalfa quality content

Yadong Wang; Chong Xu; Qian Gu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1297468

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-4fe7639eae9decb1f9255491971fa67edef9618df933db32ad7486e505856d87 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.