Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Boron deficiency decreased the number of cotton reproductive branches and structures.

A claim from Carbohydrate production and transport in cotton cultivars grown under boron deficiency · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron deficiency decreased the number of cotton reproductive branches and structures.

Treatment
B deficiencye0
Outcome
number of reproductive branches and structurese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf area and the number of reproductive branches and structures decreased due to B deficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–819
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47
t1

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47

Title

Carbohydrate production and transport in cotton cultivars grown under boron deficiency

Julio Cesar Bogiani; Amanda Cristina Esteves Amaro; Ciro Antonio Rosolem Scientia Agricola 2013. doi:10.1590/s0103-90162013000600010

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-516fc3ee51a0b4e9cf1efe827d123258ed0a78c0d7924973e61a066e67ceefe4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

boron atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
    Ovules in medium lacking boron callused and accumulated brown substances, with an increase in both.

    Interaction of Boron with Components of Nucleic Acid Metabolism in Cotton Ovules Cultured in Vitro · 1977 · compared with defined nutrient medium

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.