Claim · model-written summary
Mean mites per day were higher at winter wheat field margins than in more distant fields.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Interactor
- Aceria TulipaeAceria tulipaet0pest
- Outcome
- mean number of mites per daye0
- Direction
- significantly greatere0
- Comparator
- fields at some distance from the source of infestation in volunteer wheate0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mean number of mites per day from 7 traps on margins of winter wheat fields was significantly greater than that of 13 traps in fields at some distance from the source of infestation in volunteer wheat”
t0“Aceria Tulipae (K.), Vector of Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus1”
Title
R. Staples; W. B. Allington Annals of the Entomological Society of America 1959. doi:10.1093/aesa/52.2.159
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Method / resource Small slides were more efficient per unit area than large slides in 7 of 11 comparisons.
- Method / resource Small slides caught as many mites as large slides in five comparisons.
- Method / resource A funnel did not improve trapping efficiency.
- Method / resource The trap method satisfactorily measured mite populations in volunteer wheat.
- Method / resource One trap estimated a uniform population well.
- Observation Individual trap means did not differ significantly between locations.
- Association Daily mite catches in volunteer wheat correlated significantly with catches in winter wheat fields and margins.