Claim · model-written summary
Individual trap means did not differ significantly between locations.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Interactor
- Aceria TulipaeAceria tulipaet0pest
- Outcome
- means of the individual trap collectionse0
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“means of the individual trap collections did not differ significantly”
t0“Aceria Tulipae (K.), Vector of Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus1”
Title
R. Staples; W. B. Allington Annals of the Entomological Society of America 1959. doi:10.1093/aesa/52.2.159
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Method / resource Small slides were more efficient per unit area than large slides in 7 of 11 comparisons.
- Method / resource Small slides caught as many mites as large slides in five comparisons.
- Method / resource A funnel did not improve trapping efficiency.
- Method / resource The trap method satisfactorily measured mite populations in volunteer wheat.
- Method / resource One trap estimated a uniform population well.
- Observation Mean mites per day were higher at winter wheat field margins than in more distant fields.
- Association Daily mite catches in volunteer wheat correlated significantly with catches in winter wheat fields and margins.