Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Minimum tillage produced significantly higher maize grain and straw yields than conventional tillage.

A claim from Effect of tillage and precision nutrient placement on enhanced yield, productivity and profitability of maize (Zea mays) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage produced significantly higher maize grain and straw yields than conventional tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Minimum tillagee1
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher grain and straw yields compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–150
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120
e1

“Minimum tillage led to improved growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38

Title

Effect of tillage and precision nutrient placement on enhanced yield, productivity and profitability of maize (Zea mays)

PRAKASH SONNAD; TEEKAM SINGH; RAJ SINGH; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i8.166650

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-51df1c2addff78ce4a5861a2fc2fb8b59b9708edfb055eb33e4a06c2f8ac3ff6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.