Claim · model-written summary
Minimum tillage produced significantly higher maize grain and straw yields than conventional tillage.
- Treatment
- Minimum tillagee1
- Outcome
- grain and straw yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly higher grain and straw yields compared to conventional tillage”
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e1“Minimum tillage led to improved growth”
Title
PRAKASH SONNAD; TEEKAM SINGH; RAJ SINGH; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i8.166650
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage improved maize growth and yield attributes over conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage grain and straw yields were statistically similar to zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Band placement of 100% RDF improved maize yield attributes, productivity, and profitability relative to band placement of 75% RDF and conventional 100% RDF.
- Intervention effect Band placement of 100% RDF had statistically similar yield attributes, productivity, and profitability to point placement of 50% RDF.
- Intervention effect Band placement of 100% RDF gave superior net returns and B:C ratio over 75% RDF band placement and conventional 100% RDF.
- Intervention effect Band placement of 100% RDF had no significant net return or B:C ratio difference from point placement of 50% RDF.
- Intervention effect Minimum tillage gave significantly greater net returns and improved B:C ratios than conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage gave significantly greater net returns and improved B:C ratios than conventional tillage.
- Recommendation The authors recommend point placement of 50% RDF to save 50% fertilizer compared with conventional 100% RDF broadcasting.
- Recommendation The authors recommend 75% RDF band placement to save 25% fertilizer compared with conventional 100% RDF broadcasting.