Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Three irrigations increased grain yield by 33.1 and 19.4% over rainfed conditions.

A claim from Influence of sowing windows and irrigation scheduling on agro-meteorological indices and wheat yield · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations increased grain yield by 33.1 and 19.4% over rainfed conditions.

Treatment
3 irrigationse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33.1 and 19.4 %e0
Comparator
rainfed conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the largest increase in grain yield was recorded with 3 irrigations (33.1 and 19.4 %) and Penman Monteith modified (33.7 and 13.5 %) over rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1316
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94

Title

Influence of sowing windows and irrigation scheduling on agro-meteorological indices and wheat yield

P Bheem; S R Ranbir; M Sandeep; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.14003

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-5320433fdc66c339913f7e642c50ced170936a4418502cd0b6398103aa3bca8a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.