Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Crop N, P and K removal was higher with guided nitrogen and residue in 2014 15.

A claim from Weed-management and wheat productivity in a conservation agriculture-based maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum)mungbean (Vigna radiata) system in north-western Indo-Gangetic plains of India · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop N, P and K removal was higher with guided nitrogen and residue in 2014 15.

Treatment
ZT + R + 75% N + rest N based on GreenSeeker (GS)e0
Outcome
N, P and K removed by the crope0
Direction
highere0
Value
34.6%e0
Qualifier
2014 15e0
Comparator
CT-R + 100% N (farmer practice)e0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Verbatim

e0

“The sum total amount of N, P and K removed by the crop was higher in ZT + R + 75% N + rest N based on GreenSeeker (GS) than CT-R + 100% N (farmer practice) to the tune of 23.8% and 34.6% in 201314 and 2014 15, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1453
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–116

Title

Weed-management and wheat productivity in a conservation agriculture-based maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum)mungbean (Vigna radiata) system in north-western Indo-Gangetic plains of India

C.P. NATH; T.K. DAS; K.S. RANA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i4.4492

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-5322e8a34ff66ba1eec1b5214d802bb16521e419205f6b182c64e7201018a54c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.