Claim · model-written summary
No tillage increased maize profit.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NT decreased the net profit for rice and wheat but increased the profit for maize”
Title
Benefits and Trade-Offs of Tillage Management in China: A Meta-Analysis
Yingcheng Wang; Hao Ying; Yulong Yin; et al. Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11081495
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Deep tillage increased crop yield by 7.5% relative to rotary tillage.
- Observation Deep tillage yield gains were greater in low temperature regions and wheat systems.
- Intervention effect No tillage reduced crop yield by 3.7% relative to rotary tillage.
- Observation Appropriate temperature and long extension duration could reduce no tillage yield losses or increase yield.
- Intervention effect Deep tillage enhanced soil organic carbon sequestration relative to rotary tillage.
- Intervention effect No tillage enhanced soil organic carbon sequestration relative to rotary tillage.
- Intervention effect Deep tillage increased total greenhouse gas emissions.
- Intervention effect Deep tillage increased energy costs.
- Intervention effect No tillage reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
- Observation Deep tillage had positive net profit across cropping systems.
- Intervention effect No tillage decreased rice net profit.
- Intervention effect No tillage decreased wheat net profit.