Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 100% RDF increased grain, straw and biological yield relative to 75% RDF and was at par with 125% RDF.

A claim from Effect of different fertiliser levels and herbicide treatments on weeds and wheat · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF increased grain, straw and biological yield relative to 75% RDF and was at par with 125% RDF.

Treatment
100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P/ha)e0
Outcome
grain, straw and biological yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at par with 125% RDFe0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 100% RDF (120-40 kg N-P/ha) application recorded significantly higher weed biomass, wheat growth indices (wheat growth rate, leaf area index net assimilation rate), grain, straw and biological yield than75% RDF and was at par with 125% RDF (150-50 kg N-P/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–846

Title

Effect of different fertiliser levels and herbicide treatments on weeds and wheat

Sarita; Ishwar Singh; M.L. Mehriya; et al. Indian Journal of Weed Science 2021. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2021.00068.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-5469fe9eb917c034271a4c970bae630815a2ef2caaeddd60ddf858d206374737 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.