Claim · model-written summary
Broad bean bioassay growth in bark-painted soil was 70.5% of control.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- BPe0
- Outcome
- growth of the indicator plantse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 70.5e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth of the indicator plants grown in soil taken from the application treatments was reduced to 70.5, 56.1 and 23.6% of control for the BP, RSD and SD, respectively.”
t0“sweet cherry”
Title
Tadeusz Jacyna; Kenneth G. Dodds The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 1999. doi:10.1080/14620316.1999.11511097
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Soil and row-side drenches inhibited shoot growth by 69 days, earlier than bark painting.
- Intervention effect Soil and row-side drenches reduced fruit set.
- Intervention effect Bark painting did not reduce fruit set.
- Intervention effect Paclobutrazol did not influence yield in the application year.
- Intervention effect Two-year cumulative yield ranked bark painting highest, then control, row-side drench, and soil drench.
- Intervention effect Treatments did not adversely affect fruit quality.
- Intervention effect Treated trees tended to produce significantly larger fruit than untreated controls.
- Intervention effect Broad bean bioassay growth in row-side drench soil was 56.1% of control.
- Intervention effect Broad bean bioassay growth in soil-drenched soil was 23.6% of control.
- Recommendation Authors recommend considering bark application in high-density cherry plantings.