Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Recovery rates of silica did not differ significantly among nitrogen application rates.

A claim from 水稲による施用ケイ酸の吸収と窒素施用量の関係 · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery rates of silica did not differ significantly among nitrogen application rates.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativae1
Treatment
ditferent nitrogen application ratese0
Outcome
recovery rates of silicae0
Direction
no significant ditferencese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant ditferences in recovery rates of silica among the ditferent nitrogen application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1111
e1

“by rice plant and application rates of nitrogen (N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–163

Title

水稲による施用ケイ酸の吸収と窒素施用量の関係

真壁, 周平; 角田, 憲一; 佐々木, 由佳; et al. Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) 2009

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-58f34ffd20f8d69a508226c01499ced9ee5c2fcaf91db44caac035bc72cf8cf7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 86 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.