Claim · model-written summary
Relative to BS, MBS increased plant height by 26.40%.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- MBS treatmente0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 26.40e0
- Comparator
- BS treatmente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with BS treatment, cotton finial emergence rate, emergence index, vigor index, plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area index of MBS treatment increased by 27.78, 39.83, 74.79, 26.40, 14.01, and 57.22%, respectively”
Title
Guo Yi; Wang Quanjiu; Wang Kang; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2023. doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04199-7
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Magnetized water increased soil water content and improved desalination for fresh and brackish water.
- Intervention effect Magnetized water promoted cotton emergence and seedling growth.
- Intervention effect Relative to FS, MFS increased final cotton emergence rate by 6.25%.
- Intervention effect Relative to FS, MFS increased emergence index by 7.19%.
- Intervention effect Relative to FS, MFS increased vigor index by 12.98%.
- Intervention effect Relative to FS, MFS increased plant height by 15.60%.
- Intervention effect Relative to FS, MFS increased stem diameter by 8.91%.
- Intervention effect Relative to FS, MFS increased leaf area index by 20.57%.
- Intervention effect Relative to BS, MBS increased final emergence rate by 27.78%.
- Intervention effect Relative to BS, MBS increased emergence index by 39.83%.
- Intervention effect Relative to BS, MBS increased vigor index by 74.79%.
- Intervention effect Relative to BS, MBS increased stem diameter by 14.01%.
- Intervention effect Relative to BS, MBS increased leaf area index by 57.22%.
- Intervention effect Magnetized spring irrigation increased cotton chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate.
- Method / resource MRHM was the optimal model for fitting the cotton light response curve.
- Intervention effect Relative to FS, MFS increased P nmax, R d, I c, I sat and Δ I by 5.18, 3.41, 3.18, 2.29 and 2.19%, respectively.
- Intervention effect Relative to BS, MBS increased P nmax, R d, I c, I sat and Δ I by 26.44, 29.48, 30.05, 5.13 and 2.27%, respectively.