Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Half the recommended nitrogen dose with two nano-urea sprays had the lowest CO2 equivalent emissions per ton of grain.

A claim from Effects of irrigation regimes and nitrogen management practices on wheat productivity, soil health, and co2 equivalent ghg emissions in rainfed environments · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half the recommended nitrogen dose with two nano-urea sprays had the lowest CO2 equivalent emissions per ton of grain.

Treatment
50% RDN + two nano-urea sprayse0
Outcome
CO2 equivalent emissions per ton of graine0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% RDN + two nano-urea sprays resulted in the lowest CO2 equivalent emissions per ton of grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–681
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72

Title

Effects of irrigation regimes and nitrogen management practices on wheat productivity, soil health, and co2 equivalent ghg emissions in rainfed environments

Abhijit Mandal; Teekam Singh; Ayan Sarkar; et al. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 2025. doi:10.3329/bjb.v54i2.82294

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5a7dbd2b9d311c8ffebc88550510658885e5c882fceb8980ea05e31c714129e1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

application · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.