Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High irradiance increased tomato leaf area and leaf, root and stem dry weight relative to lower irradiance.

A claim from Effects of Low Irradiance on Growth, Water Uptake and Yield of Tomatoes Grown by the Nutrient Film Technique · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irradiance increased tomato leaf area and leaf, root and stem dry weight relative to lower irradiance.

Treatment
High irradiance (14.7 and 8.5 MJ m-2day-1)e0
Outcome
leaf area and dry weight, root and stem dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
lower irradiancee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High irradiance (14.7 and 8.5 MJ m-2day-1) increased leaf area and dry weight, root and stem dry weight compared to the plants grown under lower irradiance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–430
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71

Title

Effects of Low Irradiance on Growth, Water Uptake and Yield of Tomatoes Grown by the Nutrient Film Technique

Mohd Razi Ismail; Zainab Ali; Selangor Darul Ehsan Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) 1994

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5acd5307ef0e2fcbb87f8e43b8f7488dd7474b1d4745cf75a0ce286b4faea158 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

(-)-methyl jasmonate · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

light · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 155 positive, 71 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

217 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.