Claim · model-written summary
No tillage reduced direct energy relative to conventional tillage under irrigation by 52.5%.
- Taxon
- Hungarian Vetcht0
- Treatment
- NT practicee0
- Outcome
- directe0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 52.5%e0
- Qualifier
- irrigatede0
- Comparator
- CTe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Verbatim
t0“Hungarian Vetch”
e0“NT practice required significantly lower total (20.6% in irrigated and 27.8% in rainfed), direct (52.5% in irrigated and 68.8% in rainfed), and nonrenewable energies (23.1% in irrigated and 32.3% in rainfed) and provided higher energy ratio (24.0% in irrigated and 53.2% in rainfed) compared to CT.”
Title
Zinnur Gozubuyuk; Ustun Sahin; Ahmet Celik Environmental Engineering Science 2020. doi:10.1089/ees.2019.0302
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage had the highest diesel use under irrigation, 52.2 L/ha.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage had the highest diesel use under rainfed conditions, 53.1 L/ha.
- Intervention effect No tillage had the lowest diesel use under irrigation, 16.4 L/ha.
- Intervention effect No tillage had the lowest diesel use under rainfed conditions, 16.6 L/ha.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage required the most total energy under irrigation, 11827.4 MJ/ha.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage required the most total energy under rainfed conditions, 9328.5 MJ/ha.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage had the lowest energy ratio under irrigation, 4.41.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage had the lowest energy ratio under rainfed conditions, 3.87.
- Intervention effect No tillage reduced total energy relative to conventional tillage under irrigation by 20.6%.
- Intervention effect No tillage reduced total energy relative to conventional tillage under rainfed conditions by 27.8%.
- Intervention effect No tillage reduced direct energy relative to conventional tillage under rainfed conditions by 68.8%.
- Intervention effect No tillage reduced nonrenewable energy relative to conventional tillage under irrigation by 23.1%.
- Intervention effect No tillage reduced nonrenewable energy relative to conventional tillage under rainfed conditions by 32.3%.
- Intervention effect No tillage raised energy ratio by 24.0% under irrigation relative to conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect No tillage raised energy ratio by 53.2% under rainfed conditions relative to conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Irrigation increased energy gain by 48.2% on average.
- Intervention effect Conservation tillage logarithmically reduced CO2 emissions in both rotations.
- Intervention effect No tillage generated 68.7% lower emissions on average than conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Reduced tillage generated 42.2% lower emissions on average than conventional tillage.