Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment 9 gave the highest grain yield, 4387.10 kg/ha.

A claim from Effect of potassium and zinc on growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 9 gave the highest grain yield, 4387.10 kg/ha.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
Potassium 55 kg/ha + Zinc 25kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4387.10 kg/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (4387.10 kg/ha) and stover yield (7886.59 kg/ha) were recorded highest in treatment 9 (Potassium 55 kg/ha + Zinc 25kg/ha) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1492
e1

“growth attributes of Pearl millet at 80 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1191

Title

Effect of potassium and zinc on growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)

Nitigya Umrao; Shraddha Rawat International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i5sb.2931

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-5b4e13d86e7cb180b9ecaed04ca78df464552180a9eacdc28fdd710b8cba1193 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.