Paper · 2012 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of Potassium on Pearl millet-Wheat Cropping System in Coarse Textured Soils of Southern Haryana

S. S. Yadav; Abha Tikkoo; Janardan Singh

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was carried out on a loamy sand soil of southern Haryana for eight years (2002 to 2010) to study the direct effect of potassium application (0, 30 and 60 kg K2O ha−1, applied in rabi) on wheat and its residual effect on pearl millet in pearl millet-wheat cropping system. The results revealed that wheat responded significantly to direct application of potassium up to 30 kg K2O ha−1, whereas its residual effect on pearl millet was found to be significant at 60 kg K2O ha−1. The potassium application significantly increased crop yield and K uptake by wheat and pearl millet. The mean available K status of soil decreased to 105.0, 127.5 and 145.3 kg K ha−1 with lower N and to 101.1, 126.9 and 141.0 kg K ha−1 with higher N levels at 0, 30 and 60 kg K2O ha−1 treatments, respectively from the mean initial available K of 158 kg ha−1 after harvest of eight years of continuous pearl millet-wheat cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat responded significantly to potassium application up to 30 kg K2O per ha.

Treatment
direct application of potassiume1
Outcome
wheate1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat responded significantly to direct application of potassium up to 30 kg K2O ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual effect of potassium on pearl millet was significant at 60 kg K2O per ha.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse2
Treatment
60 kg K2O ha−1e2
Outcome
residual effect on pearl millete2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“its residual effect on pearl millet was found to be significant at 60 kg K2O ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application significantly increased crop yield and K uptake by wheat and pearl millet.

Taxon
wheat and pearl milletCenchrus americanusTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
potassium applicatione3
Outcome
crop yield and K uptakee3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The potassium application significantly increased crop yield and K uptake by wheat and pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With lower N, mean available soil K decreased to 105.0, 127.5 and 145.3 kg K/ha after eight years of pearl millet-wheat cropping.

Taxon
pearl millet-wheate6
Treatment
lower Ne5
Outcome
mean available K status of soile5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
105.0, 127.5 and 145.3 kg K ha−1e5
Comparator
initial available K of 158 kg ha−1e6

Verbatim

e5

“The mean available K status of soil decreased to 105.0, 127.5 and 145.3 kg K ha−1 with lower N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–685 · show in text ↑
e6

“from the mean initial available K of 158 kg ha−1 after harvest of eight years of continuous pearl millet-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With higher N, mean available soil K decreased to 101.1, 126.9 and 141.0 kg K/ha after eight years of pearl millet-wheat cropping.

Taxon
pearl millet-wheate6
Treatment
higher N levelse7
Outcome
mean available K status of soile5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
101.1, 126.9 and 141.0 kg K ha−1e7
Comparator
initial available K of 158 kg ha−1e6

Verbatim

e5

“The mean available K status of soil decreased to 105.0, 127.5 and 145.3 kg K ha−1 with lower N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–685 · show in text ↑
e6

“from the mean initial available K of 158 kg ha−1 after harvest of eight years of continuous pearl millet-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–926 · show in text ↑
e7

“to 101.1, 126.9 and 141.0 kg K ha−1 with higher N levels at 0, 30 and 60 kg K2O ha−1 treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–799 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

potassium · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.