Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Potassium application significantly increased crop yield and K uptake by wheat and pearl millet.

A claim from Effect of Potassium on Pearl millet-Wheat Cropping System in Coarse Textured Soils of Southern Haryana · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application significantly increased crop yield and K uptake by wheat and pearl millet.

Taxon
wheat and pearl milletCenchrus americanusTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
potassium applicatione3
Outcome
crop yield and K uptakee3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The potassium application significantly increased crop yield and K uptake by wheat and pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–589

Title

Effect of Potassium on Pearl millet-Wheat Cropping System in Coarse Textured Soils of Southern Haryana

S. S. Yadav; Abha Tikkoo; Janardan Singh Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2012

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-143ee4c57df7debe4e8a6c4719250eb34c3043e945a3ac89cbfd44ade338d9de · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

248 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.