Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reduced-rate herbicide at twofold seeding gave yield equal to full herbicide at recommended seeding.

A claim from Developing an Integrated Weed Management System for Herbicide-Resistant Weeds Using Lentil (Lens culinaris) as a Model Crop · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced-rate herbicide at twofold seeding gave yield equal to full herbicide at recommended seeding.

Taxon
Lentil (Lens culinaris)Lens culinarist0
Treatment
reduced-rate herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
equale0
Qualifier
2Xe0
Comparator
full herbicide treatment at the recommended seeding ratee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fully integrated and reduced-rate herbicide treatments at 2X and 4X seeding rates had yields equal to those of the full herbicide treatment at the recommended seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1350
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107

Title

Developing an Integrated Weed Management System for Herbicide-Resistant Weeds Using Lentil (Lens culinaris) as a Model Crop

Colleen Redlick; Lena D. Syrovy; Hema S. N. Duddu; et al. Weed Science 2017. doi:10.1017/wsc.2017.47

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-5b9ad2fef64ea112fd1db91c5bd3af0677ad9aeb284a6f94cd8555c4f061326c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.