Claim · model-written summary
At Ottina, sub-row mulching raised malic acid compared with rolling.
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At Ottina, SRM assured, for data pooled over years, higher total soluble solids (TSS) and malic acid and lower pH than R”
t0“grapevines”
Title
Leonardo Cunial; Irene Diti; Paolo Bonini; et al. European Journal of Agronomy 2025. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2025.127514
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Rolling caused no significant variation in grapevine water status, gas exchange or performance.
- Intervention effect Sub-row mulching suppressed weeds at Sartori.
- Intervention effect Sub-row mulching maintained less negative predawn water potential in warm periods of 2022 and 2023.
- Intervention effect Sub-row mulching had little impact on leaf water status, gas exchange and vine performance.
- Intervention effect At Ottina, sub-row mulching raised total soluble solids compared with rolling.
- Intervention effect At Ottina, sub-row mulching lowered pH compared with rolling.
- Intervention effect Nitrofert increased yield without a vigor change.
- Intervention effect Nitrofert did not change vine vigor.
- Intervention effect Nitrofert delayed ripening with lower soluble solids, pH and anthocyanins.
- Intervention effect Nitrofert increased tartaric acid at harvest.
- Intervention effect Humusfert significantly lowered berry potassium relative to Nitrofert.