Intervention effectmodel-written summary

I3 irrigation increased grain yield by 18.3% over I1.

A claim from Productivity, Profitability and Nutrient Uptake as Influenced by Tillage Practices and Irrigation Scheduling in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Subtropical Climatic Conditions · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I3 irrigation increased grain yield by 18.3% over I1.

Treatment
I3 irrigation schedulee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.3%e0
Comparator
I1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield increased by and 18.3% over I1 and 8.6% over I2 in I3 irrigation schedule.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1088
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117

Title

Productivity, Profitability and Nutrient Uptake as Influenced by Tillage Practices and Irrigation Scheduling in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Subtropical Climatic Conditions

Vineet Kumar; R. K. Naresh; Satendra Kumar; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-5be0c34a8930d200a62da63eaacd70d8d4e646563c78e5d1f793806245076f17 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.