Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Limiting potassium did not change anion percentage.

A claim from EFFECTS OF LIMITING IONS ON THE ABSORPTION OF NUTRIENTS BY WHEAT · 1944

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limiting potassium did not change anion percentage.

Treatment
Limiting potassiume0
Outcome
percentage of anionse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limiting potassium had no effect on percentage of anions but decreased the total weight absorbed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–473
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64

Title

EFFECTS OF LIMITING IONS ON THE ABSORPTION OF NUTRIENTS BY WHEAT

Dyson Rose; A. G. McCalla Canadian Journal of Research/Canadian journal of research 1944. doi:10.1139/cjr44c-007

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-5d2fd4be950ec3208ba67283f95a7c2610b89568a66e1f39693de10e08f06fb5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.