Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero-tillage maize gives a significant 9.4% average yield increase over conventional tillage (6701 vs 6125 kg/ha).

A claim from Zero Tillage Method of Maize Cultivation in Visakhapatnam District of North Coastal Zone of Andhra Pradesh · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-tillage maize gives a significant 9.4% average yield increase over conventional tillage (6701 vs 6125 kg/ha).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Zero-tillagee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
9.4%e1
Qualifier
6701 kg/ha vs. 6125 kg/hae1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Visakhapatnam district of Andhra Pradeshe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize is a major predominant crop during the Rabi season in the Visakhapatnam district of Andhra Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–114
e1

“Zero-tillage maize recorded a significant yield advantage, with an average increase of 9.4% (6701 kg/ha vs. 6125 kg/ha in conventional tillage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–893

Title

Zero Tillage Method of Maize Cultivation in Visakhapatnam District of North Coastal Zone of Andhra Pradesh

P.B. Pradeep Kumar; B. Bhavani; Tejaewara Rao Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17913182

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5f005c37db3280bc21215b4519cbabe756be5889f3fada3f51028f6e82c9211a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.