Intervention effectmodel-written summary

B content increased through 1.0 mg B kg−1 soil boron, then showed no further significant increase.

A claim from Influence of Levels and Methods of Boron Application on the Yield and Uptake of Boron by Cotton in a Calcareous Soil of Punjab · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B content increased through 1.0 mg B kg−1 soil boron, then showed no further significant increase.

Treatment
1.0 mg B kg−1 soil-applied B levele0
Outcome
B contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95
e0

“The mean B content and its uptake by seed cotton and roots increased significantly up to 1.0 mg B kg−1 soil-applied B level and then recorded nonsignificant with further higher levels of boron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1280

Title

Influence of Levels and Methods of Boron Application on the Yield and Uptake of Boron by Cotton in a Calcareous Soil of Punjab

Sunil Kumar; Dinesh Kumar; K. S. Sekhon; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2018. doi:10.1080/00103624.2018.1431268

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-5fdbb479dbd6b1eca437150b57f9b0b3b7294f32e5155b628f1d208bb0fc3463 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

boron atom · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.