Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost was better than farmyard manure.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- better organic nutrient sourcee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- farmyard manuree0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Vermicompost emerged as better organic nutrient source over farmyard manure.”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
Title
Ranjit Chatterjee; Subhendu Bandyopadhyay; Jagadish Chandra Jana International Journal of Scientific Research in Knowledge 2014. doi:10.12983/ijsrk-2014-p0233-0240
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Nutrient sources influenced tomato growth and yield attributes.
- Intervention effect Nutrient sources influenced nitrogen use efficiency parameters.
- Observation Combined manures and biofertilizer allowed substitution of a quarter of fertilizer dose.
- Intervention effect Biofertilizer inoculation gave more positive results than uninoculated treatments.
- Association Biofertilizer benefits were prominent with vermicompost.
- Intervention effect The 75% inorganic fertilizer plus vermicompost and biofertilizer schedule performed best across production and nitrogen outcomes.
- Recommendation The authors recommend this schedule for yield, nitrogen use and soil fertility.