Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Scientific Research in Knowledge

Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Ranjit Chatterjee; Subhendu Bandyopadhyay; Jagadish Chandra Jana

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato plant demands adequate plant nutrients especially nitrogen for optimum growth and yield. Amount of dry matter produced per unit of nitrogen applied or absorbed can be judged by estimating the nitrogen use efficiency of different nutrient sources used for tomato cultivation. The present experiment was aimed to examine the effect of 15 different combinations of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on growth and yield attributes, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen balance. The result revealed that tomato growth and yield attributes as well as different parameters of nitrogen use efficiency (PFP, AE, PUE and AR) were remarkably influenced by the application of different sources of nutrients. Substitution of 25% of recommended fertilizer dose was possible when higher amount of organic manures and biofertilizer were combined together. Vermicompost emerged as better organic nutrient source over farmyard manure. Inoculation with biofertilizer exerted more positive result over uninoculated treatments and benefits of biofertilizer application were prominent in presence of vermicompost. The nutrient schedule comprising of 75% recommended fertilizer dose of inorganic fertilizers and vermicompost (4 t/ha) inoculated with biofertilizer was found best for growth, yield attributes as well as the NUE parameters and soil nitrogen balance. This should be practiced to achieve desired yield, nutrient use efficiency and sustaining the fertility and productivity of soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient sources influenced tomato growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
different sources of nutrientse0
Outcome
tomato growth and yield attributese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato growth and yield attributes as well as different parameters of nitrogen use efficiency (PFP, AE, PUE and AR) were remarkably influenced by the application of different sources of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient sources influenced nitrogen use efficiency parameters.

Treatment
different sources of nutrientse0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency (PFP, AE, PUE and AR)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different parameters of nitrogen use efficiency (PFP, AE, PUE and AR) were remarkably influenced by the application of different sources of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined manures and biofertilizer allowed substitution of a quarter of fertilizer dose.

Treatment
organic manures and biofertilizere0
Outcome
recommended fertilizer dosee0
Value
25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Substitution of 25% of recommended fertilizer dose was possible when higher amount of organic manures and biofertilizer were combined together.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost was better than farmyard manure.

Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Outcome
better organic nutrient sourcee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
farmyard manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost emerged as better organic nutrient source over farmyard manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation gave more positive results than uninoculated treatments.

Treatment
Inoculation with biofertilizere0
Outcome
positive resulte0
Direction
more positivee0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with biofertilizer exerted more positive result over uninoculated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer benefits were prominent with vermicompost.

Treatment
biofertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
benefitse0
Direction
prominente0
Qualifier
presence of vermicomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefits of biofertilizer application were prominent in presence of vermicompost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% inorganic fertilizer plus vermicompost and biofertilizer schedule performed best across production and nitrogen outcomes.

Treatment
75% recommended fertilizer dose of inorganic fertilizers and vermicompost (4 t/ha) inoculated with biofertilizere0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes as well as the NUE parameterse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrient schedule comprising of 75% recommended fertilizer dose of inorganic fertilizers and vermicompost (4 t/ha) inoculated with biofertilizer was found best for growth, yield attributes as well as the NUE parameters and soil nitrogen balance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend this schedule for yield, nitrogen use and soil fertility.

Outcome
desired yield, nutrient use efficiency and sustaining the fertility and productivity of soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This should be practiced to achieve desired yield, nutrient use efficiency and sustaining the fertility and productivity of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.