Abstract
Tomato plant demands adequate plant nutrients especially nitrogen for optimum growth and yield. Amount of dry matter produced per unit of nitrogen applied or absorbed can be judged by estimating the nitrogen use efficiency of different nutrient sources used for tomato cultivation. The present experiment was aimed to examine the effect of 15 different combinations of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on growth and yield attributes, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen balance. The result revealed that tomato growth and yield attributes as well as different parameters of nitrogen use efficiency (PFP, AE, PUE and AR) were remarkably influenced by the application of different sources of nutrients. Substitution of 25% of recommended fertilizer dose was possible when higher amount of organic manures and biofertilizer were combined together. Vermicompost emerged as better organic nutrient source over farmyard manure. Inoculation with biofertilizer exerted more positive result over uninoculated treatments and benefits of biofertilizer application were prominent in presence of vermicompost. The nutrient schedule comprising of 75% recommended fertilizer dose of inorganic fertilizers and vermicompost (4 t/ha) inoculated with biofertilizer was found best for growth, yield attributes as well as the NUE parameters and soil nitrogen balance. This should be practiced to achieve desired yield, nutrient use efficiency and sustaining the fertility and productivity of soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient sources influenced tomato growth and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- different sources of nutrientse0
- Outcome
- tomato growth and yield attributese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“tomato growth and yield attributes as well as different parameters of nitrogen use efficiency (PFP, AE, PUE and AR) were remarkably influenced by the application of different sources of nutrients.”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient sources influenced nitrogen use efficiency parameters.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- different sources of nutrientse0
- Outcome
- nitrogen use efficiency (PFP, AE, PUE and AR)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“different parameters of nitrogen use efficiency (PFP, AE, PUE and AR) were remarkably influenced by the application of different sources of nutrients.”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined manures and biofertilizer allowed substitution of a quarter of fertilizer dose.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- organic manures and biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- recommended fertilizer dosee0
- Value
- 25%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Substitution of 25% of recommended fertilizer dose was possible when higher amount of organic manures and biofertilizer were combined together.”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost was better than farmyard manure.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- better organic nutrient sourcee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- farmyard manuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Vermicompost emerged as better organic nutrient source over farmyard manure.”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer inoculation gave more positive results than uninoculated treatments.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- positive resulte0
- Direction
- more positivee0
- Comparator
- uninoculated treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with biofertilizer exerted more positive result over uninoculated treatments”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer benefits were prominent with vermicompost.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- biofertilizer applicatione0
- Outcome
- benefitse0
- Direction
- prominente0
- Qualifier
- presence of vermicomposte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“benefits of biofertilizer application were prominent in presence of vermicompost.”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% inorganic fertilizer plus vermicompost and biofertilizer schedule performed best across production and nitrogen outcomes.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- 75% recommended fertilizer dose of inorganic fertilizers and vermicompost (4 t/ha) inoculated with biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- growth, yield attributes as well as the NUE parameterse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The nutrient schedule comprising of 75% recommended fertilizer dose of inorganic fertilizers and vermicompost (4 t/ha) inoculated with biofertilizer was found best for growth, yield attributes as well as the NUE parameters and soil nitrogen balance.”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend this schedule for yield, nitrogen use and soil fertility.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Outcome
- desired yield, nutrient use efficiency and sustaining the fertility and productivity of soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“This should be practiced to achieve desired yield, nutrient use efficiency and sustaining the fertility and productivity of soil.”
t0“Impact of Organic Amendments and Inorganic Fertilizers on Production Potential, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen Balance in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
197 papers more in this group
See all 201 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
267 papers more in this group
See all 271 papers →fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
974 papers more in this group
See all 978 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.