Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At Xinghua, 2.0 kg·hm −2 boron increased cotton yield by 17.30%–20.58%.

A claim from Optimization of appropriate boron fertilization application range for two cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties in boron-deficient soils · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Xinghua, 2.0 kg·hm −2 boron increased cotton yield by 17.30%–20.58%.

Treatment
applying 2.0 kg·hm −2 of borone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
17.30%–20.58%e0
Setting
Xinghuae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Xinghua, applying 2.0 kg·hm −2 of boron achieved yield increases of 17.30%–20.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–648
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104

Title

Optimization of appropriate boron fertilization application range for two cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties in boron-deficient soils

Shanshan WANG; Cheng WANG; Yutian ZHANG; et al. Journal of Cotton Research 2026. doi:10.1186/s42397-026-00257-1

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-62a445b56e8cfbbb0efd8e9a1f7ea0d1e33e70c7dabec65b73761d4121272c69 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

boron atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Boron deficiency reduced cotton yield by 11% compared with 2 kg ha −1 B.

    The synergistic effects of soil-applied boron and foliar-applied silicon on cotton fiber quality and yield · 2023 · compared with 2

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.